A Man, Who Is A Domestic Helper In Cayman, Is Accused Of Injuring A Police Officer, Driving Unqualified And Without Insurance
|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
By Alric Lindsay
A man identified as Mr. Mallett appeared in the Summary Court today, June 4, 2026, to face serious charges including driving without qualification, possession of a controlled drug, and a reckless act causing injury to a police officer. He was granted bail under stringent conditions. The case, which involves allegations of a police officer being seriously injured during an attempted escape, has raised questions regarding work permit regulations and the seriousness of traffic offences.
Reportedly, the incident occurred on June 2, 2026, when Mallett was allegedly seen with illicit substances on a public beach. When confronted by police, he reportedly attempted to evade arrest, allegedly striking an officer with his vehicle. The officer sustained serious injuries to the head, arms, hands, and legs and required hospital treatment.
Notwithstanding the seriousness of the matter, Mallet’s attorney indicated that she would be seeking bail for him. During this process, it was revealed that Mallett was driving a vehicle that had not been licensed since 2019, lacked a certificate of roadworthiness, and he himself was unqualified and uninsured to drive. The controlled drug, ganja, was reportedly found on the sand nearby, with police alleging they witnessed him drop it.
Crown Counsel from the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions vigorously objected to bail, citing the seriousness of the offence – categorized as a Category B reckless and negligent act – and concerns about Mallett’s potential flight risk and compliance with conditions. She added that the officer suffered severe injuries.
Arguing on Mallet’s behalf, his attorney argued that the reckless act was unintentional, a result of panic, and emphasized Mallett’s clean record during his eight years in Cayman. He is a work permit holder, employed as a “domestic helper” for his mother. The defence attorney explained the permit was obtained to allow him to care for his sister, who has ADHD, in their mother’s absence.
However, the Chief Magistrate expressed considerable skepticism about the nature of the work permit, questioning the arrangement and hinting at it being a “permit of convenience.” Regarding this, Mallet’s attorney said it is not a work permit of convenience as Mallet cooks and cleans.
Despite DPP Crown Counsel’s objections and the Chief Magistrate’s concerns, bail was ultimately granted with exceptionally strict terms:
** A $5,000 surety is required to secure his surrender to custody.
** His passport will be retained by the court.
** He must observe a 24-hour curfew at his residence.
* He will be fitted with an electronic monitor, with exceptions only for attending court or meeting with counsel, for which he must notify the electronic monitoring center.
The Chief Magistrate’ issued a stern warning to Mallett, stating that any breach of the electronic monitoring conditions would result in immediate revocation of his freedom.
